LogoLogo
Give FeedbackGovStack Home
25Q2
25Q2
  • GovStack
  • Contributing
  • Architecture and Nonfunctional Requirements
    • 2 Introduction
    • 3 GovStack Architecture
    • 4 Building Block Design Principles and Considerations
    • 5 Cross-Cutting Requirements
    • 6 Onboarding Products
    • 7 Standards
    • 8 UX Switching and Handover
    • 9 Other Resources
  • Security Requirements
    • 2 Description
    • 3 Terminology
    • 4 Security Management
    • 5 Cross-Cutting Requirements
    • 6 Standards
    • 7 Authorization Services
    • 8 Additional Security Modules
    • 9 Other Resources
  • GovStack UI/UX Guidelines
    • 1 Version History
    • 2 Description
    • 3 Service design good practice guidelines
      • 3.1 User-centred design
        • 3.1.1.1 Understand needs and requirements
        • 3.1.1.2 Involve others in the design process
        • 3.1.2.1 Test with users
        • 3.1.3.1 Share findings
        • 3.1.3.2 Monitor performance
          • 3.1.3.3 Set up analytics
      • 3.2 Accessibility and inclusion
        • 3.2.1.1 Test for accessibility
        • 3.2.2.1 Involve a diverse user group in the design
        • 3.2.2.2 Support multiple languages
        • 3.2.2.3 Foster a culture of inclusion
      • 3.3 Consistency
        • 3.3.1.1 Use simple language
        • 3.3.2.1 Implement a consistent style guide
        • 3.3.2.2 Use design patterns
        • 3.3.2.3 Use a frontend framework
        • 3.3.3.1 Interoperability
        • 3.3.3.2 Use integrations
        • 3.3.4.1 Work in the open
      • 3.4 Technology choices
        • 3.4.1.1 Choose the right level of security
        • 3.4.1.2 Design for privacy
        • 3.4.2.1 Optimise load times
        • 3.4.2.2 Account for connectivity issues
        • 3.4.3.1 Test across platforms
        • 3.4.3.2 Design cross-channel
    • 4 Design patterns
      • 4.1 Service patterns
      • 4.2 User flows
        • 4.2.1 Register
        • 4.2.2 Authenticate
        • 4.2.3 Asking users for feedback
        • 4.2.4 Find a service
        • 4.2.5 Check a users eligibility
        • 4.2.6 Make an application
      • 4.3 Page templates
        • 4.3.1 Feedback
        • 4.3.2 Perception survey
        • 4.3.3 Satisfaction
        • 4.3.4 Before you start
        • 4.3.5 Service sheet
        • 4.3.6 Asking users for consent
        • 4.3.7 Task list
        • 4.3.8 Asking users for information
        • 4.3.9 Check answers
        • 4.3.10 Outcome
    • 5 Use-case examples
    • 6 References
    • 7 Other Resources
  • Building Blocks
    • About Building Blocks
    • Cloud Infrastructure
    • Consent
    • Digital Registries
    • E-Marketplace
    • E-Signature
    • Geographic Information System (GIS)
    • Identity
    • Information Mediation
    • Messaging
    • Payments
    • Registration
    • Scheduler
    • Workflow
    • Wallet
  • Use Cases
    • Reference Use Cases
  • Public Administration Ecosystem Reference Architecture (PAERA)
    • PAERA
  • Tools
    • Sandbox
  • Release Notes
    • 23Q4
Powered by GitBook

Apache-2.0 license

On this page
  • When to use this pattern
  • How it works

Was this helpful?

Export as PDF
  1. GovStack UI/UX Guidelines
  2. 4 Design patterns
  3. 4.3 Page templates

4.3.9 Check answers

Use this pattern to help users check, review and confirm their entered information before taking a significant final action, such as submitting.

Was this helpful?

By allowing users to review, make changes, or confirm their answers, this pattern helps prevent errors in data submission.

The long term benefits of this pattern are:

  • users will be confident while using your service as they can visually confirm that all their information has been accurately captured.

  • reducing incorrect and incomplete information will result in lower error rates in applications.

When to use this pattern

Use this pattern when you need to capture information from users on a form that spans multiple pages or steps.

How it works

  • Use a clear heading that clearly communicates the purpose of the page, such as "Check your answers before sending your application"

  • Show the summary of questions and answers given. Ensure the information is organised and easy to scan.

  • Consider the type of answers expected from users. For longer answers, utilize a full-width layout to accommodate the content. For shorter answers, a two-thirds layout may be appropriate to optimise space.

  • Break content into sections if needed. If there is a large number of questions or if it improves the clarity, divide the content into relevant sections.

  • Clearly indicate when a question has not been answered because it was optional. Make it evident to the user that the answer was not provided.

  • Provide navigation to edit answers. Offer users a straightforward way to navigate back to previous steps and edit their answers if needed. This can be achieved through direct links or buttons that allow users to easily access and modify specific questions.

  • Include a call to action button at the bottom of the page that helps the user take the final action such as submitting their application.

Check your answers example implementation